Siegel Select Business License Revocation

An unhoused student at Western Governors University said Siegel Select gives him a bed and stability so he can stay in school.

A Siegel Select resident of over a year said it's professional, safe, and a good place to live, and he wants to keep living there.

Representing the Siegel Group, she urged the council to open direct communication with ownership and said residents are scared and underinformed about what revocation means for them.

A returning speaker said Siegel Select serves elderly, disabled, and domestic-violence victims as a last resort and that residents shop locally, benefiting Pelham businesses.

A room 414 resident praised the property as safe and well-managed and asked the council to make a decision that lets residents keep their home.

Attorney for Siegel Select argued the proceeding is procedurally deficient, that no lease exceeds 180 days, and that revocation would displace hardworking and vulnerable residents including domestic violence victims.

A two-year resident who said the property is quiet and safe and accused the city of pursuing the revocation over money.

A domestic violence survivor who said Siegel Select is the first safe place for her family, and begged the council not to leave them homeless.

A resident and employee who said the community there is her home and urged the council to find a solution that doesn't put people on the street.

A resident of nearly a year who praised the staff and safety, and asked the council to let residents stay.

A resident with PTSD who said the uncertainty is harmful, and argued the action is really about tax money rather than the residents.